1. Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiffs each of KRW 60,000,000, and Defendant C from September 1, 2015 to December 1, 2016.

1. The following facts of recognition may be acknowledged by integrating the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 3.

The plaintiffs of the parties are owners of the instant vessel (fishing vessel number E, fishing vessel name E, fishing vessel name FRP, major water storage: 14.85m in length, 3.98m in width, 0.9m in depth, 0.9m in gross tonnage, 7.93m in gross tonnage: hereinafter referred to as “instant vessel”), Defendant C is the lessee of the instant vessel from the plaintiffs, and G is the father of Defendant C.

B. On January 6, 2015, the Plaintiffs leased the instant vessel from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017, the Plaintiff leased KRW 90 million (20 million up to May 20, 2015, and KRW 10 million up to September 20, 2015, and KRW 60 million up to September 20, 2015, respectively, to Defendant C with the payment of KRW 30 million each year on December 31, 2015. Meanwhile, on January 6, 2015, the Plaintiffs agreed to pay KRW 100 million in the name of the Plaintiffs’ installment savings at the same time with the vessel lease agreement as above.

(3) At the time of the conclusion of the above lease agreement, Defendant C and G were jointly and severally guaranteed the obligation to be borne by Defendant C to the Plaintiffs under the above lease agreement. (4) After the conclusion of the above lease agreement, Defendant C and G were handed over the instant vessel by the Plaintiff.

C. Defendant C’s non-performance of obligation 1) However, until September 2015, Defendant C did not pay the Plaintiff the agreed rent of KRW 30 million (20 million as of May 20, 2015, and KRW 10 million as of September 20, 2015, and Defendant C did not perform its duty of KRW 100 million for fishing gear expenses and crew members.

In addition, Defendant C is dissatisfied with this.