The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (two years of imprisonment) against the accused against the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Although the court below recognized some favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes, and deposited money equivalent to the amount of damage for the victims, etc., the above favorable circumstances seems to have already been reflected in the court below, the defendant had been punished by putting the same crime under several similar veterinary methods, and the defendant committed the crime of this case again even during the period of repeated crime, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., are too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant and his defense counsel's allegation of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.