logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.01.18 2016가합54317
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From May 31, 199 to November 23, 2015, the Plaintiff is the father and interest of D who was the representative director of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”) for the purpose of wholesale business, etc. of digging expenses from May 31, 199 to November 23, 2015, and the head of B, who was the deceased on March 21, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”).

The defendant is the representative director of F Co., Ltd., who has made transactions such as discounting the number of shares in the name C.

B. On March 23, 2016, the deceased’s date of birth, around 15:00, the Defendant visited the Plaintiff’s office and demanded the settlement of the check number table ( check number H; hereinafter “instant check number table”) indicated in the Plaintiff’s “Stop amounting to KRW 500 million, the place of payment, G Co., Ltd., the date of issuance, March 23, 2016, and C (State) D.

C. On March 23, 2016, at around 15:51, the Plaintiff received a loan of KRW 500 million from an I.D. and paid KRW 500 million to the Defendant through the Labor Council on the same day.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 7 (including the number of each branch; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff damages based on the tort for the following reasons, including KRW 500 million per share of this case paid by the Plaintiff, KRW 10 million for consolation money for mental damage suffered by the Plaintiff, KRW 510 million in total, and delay damages.

1) In the event that the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff the check of the instant party units, it notified the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff’s son, recorded as the representative director of the issuer in the instant party units list, may be subject to criminal punishment, and paid KRW 500 million from the Plaintiff. 2) If the Plaintiff repaid KRW 500 million from the Defendant, the Plaintiff is also in the certificate of promissory notes with a face value of KRW 500 million issued by the deceased and his son, who are in the custody of the instant party units and the Defendant’s vehicle.

arrow