All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Judgment on the defendant's case

A. Summary of the Reasons for Appeal 1) Defendant 1: The lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unlimited and unreasonable. 2) Prosecutor’s unreasonable sentencing: The lower court’s imprisonment is too uneasible and unfair.

B. In light of the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, which can be known on the record of the judgment (this case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s buckbucks of the victim, which led to an indecent act. The Defendant not only had the record of having been sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment due to the crime of indecent act by force in the past, but also has committed the instant case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case and case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case and case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case.

The judgment of the court below cannot be deemed that the amount of punishment imposed by the defendant, his defense counsel, or the prosecutor has an unreasonable ground, as alleged in the grounds for appeal.

Judgment on the case for which an attachment order is requested

A. misunderstanding of the gist of the grounds for appeal or misunderstanding of legal principles: Considering that the person who requested the attachment order has the same criminal history, the lower court’s dismissal of the request for the attachment order of this case is erroneous or the legal doctrine on the risk of recidivism in requesting the attachment order.