The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects the wrongness, and that the defendant is not adequate for economic conditions as a recipient of basic living benefits.

However, the crime of this case is committed in violation of the purpose of legislation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, etc. of Sexual Crimes, which is to effectively prevent sexual crimes by requiring a sex offender to submit the changed details if the submitted personal information is changed, and thus, the defendant's liability is not less than that of the defendant, and the defendant has the record of being subject to criminal punishment of fines once by failing to submit the written personal information within the deadline to submit the written personal information prior to this case. In addition, considering all of the sentencing conditions of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, it is not determined that the court below's punishment that reduced the fine amount of the

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.