logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013.02.06 2012나65852
사해행위취소 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (1) The plaintiffs' claims against E are contracted from the F on June 22, 2005 with K and three lots of land row construction project (hereinafter "new construction project of this case"), and in order to secure the claim for construction payment, the purchase price of each real estate of this case shall be KRW 290,000,000 and the date of the completion of the purchase and sale contract shall be September 30, 2006, and the purchase deposit shall be KRW 70,00,000,000 shall be paid to F on the same day without a separate declaration of intention, and on June 27, 2005, the provisional registration of ownership transfer claim shall be completed (hereinafter "the provisional registration of this case").

(2) From among the new construction works of this case, the Plaintiff A and concrete non-construction works; Plaintiff B and Plaintiff C subcontracted the civil retaining wall construction works of this case from E. On July 15, 2005, the new construction works of this case was suspended; and E rescinded the contract for the new construction works between F and F on August 22, 2005.

(3) As the discontinuance of the instant new construction project, the Plaintiffs, who did not receive the completed construction cost of the subcontracted project, filed a lawsuit against E seeking payment of the construction cost or agreed on E and the construction cost as follows:

㈎ 원고 A는 E를 상대로 수원지방법원 안산지원 2007가단43054호로 공사대금의 지급을 구하는 소를 제기하여, 위 지원은 2008. 7. 8. “E는 원고 A에게 82,500,000원 및 이에 대한 지연손해금을 지급하라”는 판결을 선고하였고, 위 판결은 2008. 8. 19. 그대로 확정되었다.

㈏ 원고 B은 E를 상대로 서울남부지방법원 2007가단81135호로 공사대금의 지급을 구하는 소를 제기하여, 2008. 6. 16. 그 항소심인 위 법원 2008나3942호 사건에서 "E는 원고 B에게 40,000,000원을 지급하되...

arrow