logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2019.07.24 2019고단190
특수공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 02:20 on February 23, 2019, the Defendant engaged in special obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 02:20, and around 02:20, the Defendant: (b) took a saw that the Defendant destroyed the front door glass of the racing police station; (c) and (d) the circumstances and circumstances during which the Defendant was in charge of the investigation, and the police officer of the racing police station, who was in charge of the investigation of the Defendant’s destruction of the said front door glass box, and (d) took care of an empty f, which is a dangerous object in front of the front door of the front line, and threatened the Defendant with a saw (48 cm in length, 34 cm in length, and 34 cm in length) twice.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. Around 01:05 on the same day as stated in paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the Defendant was exposed to police officers who received a 112 report that the Defendant destroyed C’s house-to-house glass, thereby destroying C’s house-to-house glass, while driving Hpoter from the end of the house of the above C to the front day of the racing and the front day of the G.

The Defendant refused to comply with the measurement of alcohol by inserting the breath of three minutes from around 03:39 of the same day to around 28:07 of the same day, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant had driven a drunk while drunk, such as the breath of the horse, and the breath of the walk.

As a result, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for a alcohol test without justifiable reasons.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to J and K;

1. C’s statement;

1. Report on the state of state of drinking drivers, and notification of the results of the regulation of drinking driving;

1. Application of investigation report (Attachment to saw photographs of a suspect) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 144(1) of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting an offense;

arrow