logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.01.22 2015고단2618
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 20:40 on May 9, 2015, the Defendant issued an order to pay the drinking value to the victim D in Jung-gu Busan, Jung-gu, 2015, stating that he/she would pay the drinking value even if he/she does not have any money, and that he/she received the order from the victim, i.e., two parallel weeks of the total amount of KRW 244,50,00 from the seat, and the tobacco 1 A.

On June 14, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 00:00 on June 14, 2013, 2013, at the H main point operated by the Victim G in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant issued an order of the thalth alcohol and the thalth alcohol, which seems to have been paid despite the absence of the intention or ability to pay the alcohol value even if he does not drink, and received a delivery of the 220,000 won in total from the falthal and the falthal to the falthal to the injured.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property from the victim by deceiving the victim.

On December 3, 2015, the Defendant issued an order to pay the drinking value to the victim J of the victim J in Busan-gu around 05:20 on December 3, 2015, 2015, and acquired the order to pay the drinking value even if the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the drinking value even if he did not perform the drinking because there is no money in the water, and then received the order from the damaged person, namely, a total of KRW 220,00,000 from the tin.

On July 19, 2015, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol to the 'N amusement shop operated by the victim M in Suwon-gu L, Busan at around 01:00 on July 19, 2015, the Defendant, even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price, was engaged in the act as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price, and the Defendant received the delivery of alcohol and alcohol equivalent to 320,000 won from the damaged person.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property from the victim by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the accused;

arrow