logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.08.09 2017고단1483
사기
Text

Defendant

A Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

Defendant

B Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant A case: The Daegu District Court Branch of the Magu District Court Decision on February 16, 2012: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year: the lapse of the period of parole on October 26, 2012, and the parole period on December 27, 2012 / [criminal record] Defendant A operates G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”), which is a manufacturer and supplier of “F” at the window E from Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and Defendant B operates Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”), which is a company repairing and selling the machinery (hereinafter “L”), and the victim J operates the Defendant J Co. (hereinafter “L”) which is a waste recycling company in the Mari-si, Kimbuk-si.

Defendant

A In the course of operating G, if the “chip”, which is the “F” material, is supplied to G to the victim of the Fund from the financial shortage, it is possible to make profits.

By allowing the victim to enter into a contract for the supply of chips with the designated company by Defendant A and the chips, Defendant B received the money from the victim, and made a proposal to request the victim B to enter into the contract for the supply of the chips, and Defendant B accepted the above proposal.

Accordingly, Defendant A, around February 2015, ordered the victim to supply the chips to LG. G supplied F to LG electronic and to increase the F delivery volume from July 2, 201 to five times, Defendant A should be supplied with the above machinery by an enterprise designated by G as it is the patent holder for the chips production machinery. Defendant B received the above machinery supply from Defendant B as Defendant B made the above machinery and had the factory facilities. Defendant B had the above machinery installed with the victim and had a factory capable of manufacturing it.

The term "" refers to the following.

However, at the time, Defendant A was only supplied F with a small quantity of F to M, which is a LG electronic cooperation company, and the F supply volume was not expected to increase from July 2015.

arrow