The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment (three million won of fine) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the Defendant reflects his mistake; and (c) the Defendant has no other penalty force, other than once a fine due to the instant crime.

However, even in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic business establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, it is necessary to cut off and severe punishment for persons who operated or participated in illegal sexual traffic business establishments. Although the period of business in which the defendant participated is relatively long, the defendant paid investment money to co-defendant A and works as the head of office on the condition that part of operating profit is divided, and the degree of participation is more severe. In full view of the size of the business establishment of this case, the degree of punishment of the defendant's age, family environment, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the defendant's punishment against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.