logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.06.21 2017구합51994
원장자격정지등 취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition to return subsidies of KRW 3,710,400 to the Plaintiff on March 31, 2017 and unjust enrichment of KRW 2,403,50.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From January 2013, the Plaintiff operated “C Child Care Center” (hereinafter “instant Child Care Center”) which is a private child care center in Nam-gu, Incheon (hereinafter “instant Child Care Center”) and worked as the head of the instant Child Care Center.

B. The Minister of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs’s 2014 Guidelines for Child Care Services Guidance (hereinafter “Guideline 2014”) shall provide differential support by the section of the number of months of attendance at a private child care center in relation to child care (at least 11 days of attendance: 100% of the monthly unit price, at least 6-10% of the number of days of attendance at the school: 50% of the monthly unit price, at 25% of the monthly unit price, at 115,000 per person in cases of children aged 2, and at 11 days of attendance), to provide differential support for each section of the number of days of attendance at the school (at least 11 days of attendance: 50% of the monthly unit price, at 50% of the number of days of attendance at the school: 25% of the number of days of attendance at the school, and at least 25% of the basic child care guidelines for child care for at least 20 years of childcare.

The above basic childcare fees and childcare fees to be borne by guardians are automatically determined according to the above standards according to the contents of entry when the number of days of attendance of children is entered in the childcare integration system in the childcare center, and the basic childcare fees are directly paid to the childcare center and the childcare fees to be borne by the guardian are paid to the childcare center in the manner that the guardian settles with a love card.

C. As a result of the guidance and inspection on the childcare center of this case, the Defendant entered the number of days of attendance of children in the childcare integration system as shown in the attached Table of Violations.

arrow