The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds of appeal is that the Defendant’s alleged fact constitutes a false fact that he tried to take rebates in relation to the establishment of events at the Women’s Association of this case, and the Defendant did not confirm the fact at the Women’s Association of this case, and the Defendant did not submit any supporting material that the alleged fact is true, considering that the Defendant was aware that the alleged fact was false, and thus, based on the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the facts charged in this case can be sufficiently found guilty.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the person who is the Dong 102, Dong dong 102, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and the person who participated in the election of the Chairperson of the Residents' Representative Meeting, which was scheduled to be held around January 19, 2012.

피고인은 위 선거와 관련하여 위 아파트 부녀회에서 피고인의 경쟁 후보자를 지지하는 것 등에 불만을 품고, 2012. 1. 19. 15:00경 수원시 영통구 D에 있는 피고인 운영의 E 사무실에서, 컴퓨터를 이용하여 ‘부녀회는 각성하라!!!’라는 제목으로 ‘아파트 부녀회에서 튼튼하고 멀쩡한 공원벤치를 뽑아버리고 적격여부에 미달되는 벤치를 설치하여 장애물이 되었는데, 1개당 9만원에 설치할 수 있는 벤치를 1개당 33만 2천원에 10개를 설치하여 리베이트를 챙겼을 것으로 보이고, 부녀회에서 예산안 승인요청을 하면서 리베이트를 챙기려고 하였다’는 취지의 전단지를 작성한 다음, 같은 날 18:00경 위 아파트 531세대 현관문 앞에 이를 부착하였다.

However, the facts do not require rebates in relation to the establishment of events at the above apartment female conference, and in relation to the request for approval of the budget, the rebates is trying to be made.