The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is deemed to be too unhued and unfair.

2. In light of the fact that each of the crimes of this case was committed under the so-called "unexploiting type" in which the defendant deceivings victims to engage in drinking and drinking, and committed several crimes in a short period, the case is not easy. In particular, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case even if he was arrested as an unexploiting type crime and was investigated and released, and even if he was released, the defendant committed several crimes of this case, even if he had the record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and there was no agreement with the victims, damage is not recovered, and the risk of repeating crimes is very likely to occur when considering the defendant's power or attitude in this court. In addition, the circumstances after committing the crime, such as the defendant's imprisonment with other prisoners or being subject to discipline, extremely poor circumstances, which correspond to the defendant's act, are considered to require the change of the defendant's punishment in light of the circumstances and circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, and there seems to be relatively difficult for the court below to have determined the defendant's punishment of this case.

3. The prosecutor’s appeal of conclusion is without merit.