Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is an employee at the Category C film Center in the sixth-year department store B in Daejeon-gu.
On January 29, 2018, at around 13:40, the above film room opened and opened a shop gate in order to clean the screen, and opened it. The outside of the entrance opened a hallway door with frequent passage of people, from time to time by the safety manager, etc. so that the entrance can be opened safely so that pedestrians can not get off, and the entrance door may face with the attention and the customer. In such a case, the defendant was obliged to open a safe entrance in preparation for an accident, and even if the pedestrian walking along the corridor was obliged to pay attention to avoid facing the entrance, the defendant suffered additional treatment of the victim, such as the victim's elbane, and the second diagnosis of the part of the entrance, which requires additional treatment, such as the victim's 2nd diagnosis.
2. Judgment dismissing a victim's non-prosecution of punishment after a public prosecution is instituted (Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act). Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act