logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.02.09 2016고정929
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was the representative of the tenant of the apartment building B from around October 2008 to October 19, 2015, and the victim C was the representative of the apartment building B at the time of the above date. The victim D was the representative of the apartment building at the time of the above date. The victim D was the auditor of the tenant representative of the above apartment building around the above date.

On January 17, 2016, the Defendant used a computer network program at the Defendant’s residence located in the above apartment No. 4, using the computer network, “CC C CC was suspended to the effect that the Defendant was guilty, and then transferred it to the previous criminal suspect, for the following reasons: (a) he was convicted of the Defendant, by using the computer network program; (b) he requested a estimate to be decided by the company that was recommended by the Defendant; (c) thrown away the tear, and taking the desire, etc.; and (c) D’s first virtue as the auditor must be fair; (d) the first virtue as the auditor must be fair; (c) in collusion with the mother trust company, inciting and booming the residents,

’ 라는 내용이 포함된 ‘B 아파트 입주자 여러분께!!’ 라는 제목의 A4 용지 4장 분량의 유인물을 작성하고, 다음 날 위 아파트 80 세대의 우편함에 위 유인물을 넣어 배포하였다.

However, in the process of the selection of CCTV controlled entities, the victim C was investigated by the Defendant due to the fact that he was found to have teared to file a complaint, and was subject to the suspension of indictment on June 16, 2015 on the ground that the parties were given the agreed period, and was in the state of suspension of indictment at the time of the preparation of the above inducement, and was not subject to the suspension of indictment, such as the contents of the inducement.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim C's reputation by openly pointing out false facts, and insultd the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Each investigation report (examination of false facts as to entries in the suspect's inducements, and examination of reference witnesses who receive the inducements dispatched by the person under consideration);

1. Entics;

1. Photographss;

arrow