The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On February 1, 2015, at around 21:05, the Defendant used a 403-dong B building Non-dong B to take a mobile phone by the victim C’s photograph on a mobile phone, and assaulted the victim by cutting off a baton and shakeing C’s bat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Protocol of examination of a witness E;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. In the investigation report, the defendant asserts to the effect that the illegality of the act constitutes self-defense or legitimate act even though he did not do so. However, in full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by this court, the defendant did not accept this part of the defendant's assertion as to whether the act of the defendant constitutes self-defense or legitimate act. Accordingly, the defendant's act cannot be seen as a "political act" or "self-defense" under the above evidence, since the act of attack and defense was conducted connected with the situation before and after the crime was committed, and the defendant's act cannot be seen as not violating the law and regulations since the defendant's act cannot be seen as a "political act" or "self-defense" under the circumstance that the defendant's act cannot be seen as a "self-defense" or "self-defense act" under the above evidence.

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. The Criminal Act of suspended sentence;