beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for three years, respectively.
However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2012 Highest 582]
1. Defendant A: (a) around July 2010, the victim F, the head of the E fishing village fraternity at the time, and the victim G, the merchant of the members of the E fishing village fraternity, who purchased the collection of the said members from the members of the E fishing village fraternity at the time, embezzled the amount of compensation paid for E fishing village fraternity members and the sales proceeds from the E fishing village fraternity in the vicinity of the Haan-gun, Haan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and reported that the victims embezzled the E fishing village fraternity members of the E; and (b) until March 2011, the victims accessed the victims of the instant misconduct in the course of investigating the said misconduct, thereby reducing the amount of 50% of the victims of the case under investigation as the one who reported the said case, and demanding money as the teaching expenses and meal expenses with police officers in charge of the instant case who investigated the victims.
On January 19, 201, the Defendant: (a) requested victims G to provide funds under the pretext of solicitation and arrangement to police officials in charge of the case belonging to the metropolitan investigation team of the Korea Coast Guard, which investigate victims G in the L office operated by the victim G in the west-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; and (b) received KRW 5 million from the victim G to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on January 19, 201.
As a result, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the cases handled by public officials.
B. From the end of December 2010 to January 201, 201, the Defendant sought from the victim F who was investigated by the Defendant’s information from the end of December 2010 to the victim F who was investigated by the Party in charge of the instant case, to the police officer in charge of the instant case who was investigating the instant case, may reduce the level of 50% of the instant case being investigated, and demand a reduction of 40 million won under the pretext of teaching expenses and meal expenses for the police officer in charge of the instant case. On February 21, 201, the victim F. at the above L office around 18:08.