The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

In light of the above legal principle, the above hospital’s medical records is not registered as a doctor, and as a result, A did not receive the ID of the system for the preparation of the above hospital’s medical records, and upon considering the emergency room’s medical records, A had access to the system for the preparation of the register of medical records of Defendant B to prepare the register of medical records in Defendant B’s name

A around 22:50 on June 17, 2014, around 22:50, at the above H hospital emergency room, was not fireed in the emergency room of the above H hospital, and the above emergency room was searched and treated by the Defendant B, using the ID and password of the Defendant B notified by the Defendant B, access to the above hospital medical records system, and thereafter, “Sdyspepia”, “O prefessia”, and “Sspia”, and “sprinks and spices are stuffed.”

On the other hand, there are answers to, and pains. While there is a sense of jurisdiction, the Gu territory does not seem to be the Gu territory. On the other hand, the Gu territory shows the opinion of expansion of the boom. tymical sound, belged, DT/TR (---), P/Hx: HTN, “Adyspesia,” “Pbdominal x-ray, SPtoma,” “Pbdo,” “Pbdo x-rax, syptoma,” “S1.5* 20 py 1 year, but again, smoking,” “OHHHN 146/103-g; and BPPP xn; and “after the adjustment of the individual,” the Defendant was prepared and entered as the record of medical treatment by the said injured person.

As a result, Defendant B and A conspired to make a false record of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against Defendant B and A;

1. Each police statement made against K and M;

1. Data, such as a copy of medical records and medical records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions and defendant B who choose a sentence on criminal facts: Articles 88 and 22 (3) of the Medical Service Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Defendant B detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Defendant B’s order of provisional payment: (a) did not falsely state matters concerning medical practices, such as treatment progress and treatment, in the register of reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; and (b) did not have any previous convictions.