logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.10.06 2020고단2824
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 2020, the Defendant: (a) sent to the Seo-gu Daejeon apartment complex, Seo-gu, Daejeon, on April 10, 2020, at around 11:21:34, the Defendant 112 reported that the Defendant was fright to walk back the Defendant, who was a police officer belonging to the Daejeon D District, and F, was frighted to have the above F face of the Defendant returned to the Defendant, who was frighted by the police officer, and the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the Daejeon D District; and (b) continuously arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and assaulted

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties related to the handling of reports by the above E and F, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. A report on investigation, report on internal investigation, and diagnosis report on the 112 reported case handling statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and explanations of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of a fine to choose a sentence (to be imposed on the defendant in light of the background of the crime in this case, the failure to exercise the force of force, and the necessity to commit the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., which are deemed to be disadvantageous to the defendant, such as a very serious circumstance, but in depth the defendant mispercing, deposited considerable money in favor of the victimized police officers, and the damaged police officers appear to be contrary to the defendant's petition, and their spouse is in secret breathe, so the circumstance is deemed to be breath, and the defendant's wife is facing the defendant's wife, and there

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow