The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the summary of the grounds of appeal, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts, even though the defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, in light of the testimony of E, a direct witness of the crime of this case, and the relevant circumstantial evidence.

2. The lower court rendered a not guilty verdict on the facts charged of this case under the title of “2. Judgment” in detail, stating the grounds for the judgment of the lower court.

In addition to the circumstances indicated by the lower court in light of the following circumstances, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor cannot be deemed to have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine as alleged by the public prosecutor, which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case.

The prosecutor's assertion of mistake is without merit.

The witness of the instant case stated in the investigative agency that the Defendant appeared to be a witness to conduct the victim's bridge and that E was at the level to attack the defendant, but the victim was used on the floor in the court of original instance, and the defendant showed that he did not conduct the victim's chest under the former illegal condition, and that he did not conduct the victim's bridge.

(In regard to the circumstances leading up to the reversal of the statement, the victim is about to cause the victim at the time, and the victim is knee-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-kne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hum-h

The F of the "Ccafeteria" president only appears to be the victim in the investigative agency and the court of original instance.