The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

On October 11, 2016, the Defendant used “C” office located in Ansan-si B with the victim D (27 tax) to find the above office as his hand, and used the part of the victim at one time, leading the victim out of the office, leading the victim out of the office three times, leading the victim out of the office, leading the victim out of the office, and assaulted the victim to walk the victim at one time.

Judgment

The crime described in the facts charged is a crime that falls under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the same Act.

The record reveals that the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished after the prosecution of this case. Thus, this case is decided to dismiss the public prosecution in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.