1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after the appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

the purport and purpose of the claim;

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (i) deleted the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (the plaintiff withdrawn the corresponding part of the lawsuit in this court); (ii) removed the title of paragraph (4) of the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance from "a judgment on the conjunctive claim" to "a judgment on the conjunctive claim" (the plaintiff corrected the preliminary claim of first instance by this court as the primary claim); and (iii) stated the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment as described in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act to the argument that newly claims or emphasizes by the defendant in this court.

2. The portion added by this court

A. Defendant’s assertion 1) The Office for the Registration of Farmland Improvement Facilities, the Office for the Registration of Farmland Improvement Facilities, was the head of Gyeongbuk-do, and as C was incorporated into Daegu-do, the Defendant was only transferred the said land. As such, the instant lawsuit filed against Defendant, who is not the initial Office for the Registration of Farmland Improvement Facilities, should be dismissed on the ground that it is not the party’s qualification.

2) In light of the fact that the Plaintiff’s interest in a lawsuit filed an application for a building permit on the instant land in around 2015, but was rejected, and subsequently rejected and lost the administrative litigation, it is clear that the Plaintiff is keeping in mind the development rather than the deaf company from the time when acquiring the ownership of the instant land

Therefore, the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case seeking the invalidity or absence of registration of farmland improvement facilities shall be dismissed as there is no benefit of lawsuit.

3) The existence and effect of the instant illegal cause constitutes a flood area (or the elevation of the floor of a dam) along with a bank. Therefore, the registration of farmland improvement facilities site cannot be deemed null and void, and even if not, G Repair System was included in farmland improvement facilities at the time of the initial registration of farmland improvement facilities, is part of the C upper part of G Repair System in 1967.