The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (the sentence Nos. 1, 2, 3-b, c, d, e, f, g, g, children, automobiles, car, kn, strike, and No. 3-A of the holding is too unreasonable (two months of imprisonment for a crime).

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and reflected against the judgment, and that the crime is committed under Article 3-1(a) of the judgment, which is advantageous to the fact that the crime should be considered at the same time in relation to the concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act with regard to the general goods for which the judgment became final and conclusive,

However, the court below seems to have determined each punishment in consideration of the above favorable circumstances. The crime of this case was committed several times by the defendant entering a store, restaurant, private house, etc., and threatening or assaults the operator, employee, victims who are customers, and repeated acts that interfere with their duties, and thus, the crime of this case is very bad, and the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime. In particular, the defendant committed the crime of this case again without being aware of the same crime during the period of repeated crime, and did not recover the victims' damage, and even while the defendant was detained by the crime of this case, he was subject to disciplinary action of 21 days by committing the violation of the discipline.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the various sentencing conditions indicated in the previous theories, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.