Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a pharmacist who operates C pharmacy in Chuncheon B.

On April 28, 2015, at the above pharmacy around 18:40 on April 28, 2015, the Defendant was requested from the victim D (59 tax) to prepare drugs prescribed by E in the heart and doctor of E hospital. In such a case, the Defendant, who is engaged in the manufacture and preparation of drugs, has a duty of care to accurately prepare drugs in accordance with the prescription.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the victim, by negligence, who took 4 months’ volume in a prescription, to have 7.5mg of “Nemanium fry,” with the volume of 7.5mg of “Nemanium fry,” thereby causing injury to the victim, such as brain fluoring, and fluoring fluoral fluoring, by failing to comply with the prescription on September 11, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against each part of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Pharmacists' licenses;

1. A prescription, medical doctor, and prescription copy;

1. A written opinion, a medical certificate, and a medical opinion;

1. A reply to a request for cooperation in investigation and the application of each written appraisal (referring to the reduction of 524, 2016, the reduction of 122) Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order

1. The gist of the assertion was that the victim did not melt her her her fry her fry, not her her fry her fy fy her fy fy her fy fy fy her fy fy fy her fy fy fy her fy fy her fy fy her fy fy fy her fy fy fy her fy fy fy her fy fy fy her

subsection (b) of this section.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the following relevant medical knowledge is recognized:

1) The flabing of the board.