1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, each point is listed in 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 of the 8th floor in the annexed sheet.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 16, 2009, the Plaintiff, as the owner of the real estate listed in the attached list, entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the following (hereinafter referred to as the “instant lease agreement”) with regard to the office (a) Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 of the 8th floor among the real estate listed in the attached list among the real estate listed in the attached list, which successively connects the respective points of the (b) section 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 802 of the 10th floor size of the 8th floor (hereinafter referred to as the “instant office”).

On the other hand, as the contents of the above contract, if the payment of management expenses and all expenses incurred by the above contract has been delayed due to a cause attributable to the lessee, the lessee shall pay the amount in addition to 19% per annum.

B. On May 30, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a revised lease agreement with the term of lease one year, 575,000 won for monthly rent, and 425,000 won for management expenses (each additional tax is imposed separately).

C. On September 30, 2015, the Defendant’s total amount of rent that was not paid to the Plaintiff as of September 30, 2015, as indicated in the attached Table at the end of the judgment, is KRW 77,00,000, and interest interest at the rate of 19% per annum is KRW 33,575,766.

On September 14, 2015, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of his intention to terminate the instant lease agreement on the ground that the Defendant was in arrears for more than two months, and the Defendant received it.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, 6-1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the instant lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was terminated around September 14, 2015 due to the Plaintiff’s notice of termination on the ground that the delay in rent falls on the second period. Accordingly, the Defendant is the office of this case which is the object of the instant lease agreement to the Plaintiff.