Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On September 11, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment, three years of disclosure of personal information, five years of order to attach electronic devices, etc. at the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern Prison on July 13, 2017. On August 16, 2018, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced to one year of imprisonment and a fine of three million won of imprisonment, including a violation of the Act on the Protection and Observation of Specific Criminal Offenders and Electronic Monitoring, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court.
[2] On September 11, 2015, the Defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (voluntary indecent act), etc. at the Incheon District Court on September 11, 2015, and five years from the attachment order of an electronic tracking device, including “the Defendant shall not drink during the location tracking device attachment period.”
Although Defendant imposed the duty to comply with the Defendant’s “not to drink drinking,” during the period of installation of an electronic tracking device at the court, the Defendant, at around 13:00 on September 8, 2019, left the Defendant’s residence, which was located under sub-paragraph (B) of the building B in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, and left the house and again violated the duty to comply with Mauritius 1 C at the convenience store near the calendar station.
Summary of Evidence
1. A written accusation and a written notice of payment of penalties against the accused - a copy of the duty to comply with and a written notice of notification of compliance with the Act attached to the electronic device - a written request for an investigation into an electronic device subject to attachment - A written judgment [Supreme Court Decision 2016Do4034, Seoul High Court Decision 2691, 251, 2015, 2015, 439, 2015, 2015, 439, 2015, 2015, 2169, 205, 2169] of the protective observation card, the protective observation record card, and each investigation report (a report attached to the personal confinement status, and a report attached to the same electronic judgment) as a result of the measurement of drinking conditions of the protective observation.
1. A specific criminal under the relevant provision of the Act concerning the criminal facts;