logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2020.11.05 2019고단786
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The prosecution against the violation of the Labor Standards Act among the facts charged in this case is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around July 18, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D that “A about 70 reservations have been made. If 100 million won is paid, the right to photographs shall be contracted, and the right to lease on a deposit basis shall be established on the said wa Holdings building.” The Defendant did not notify the existing contractor of the right to take photographs, thereby making a false statement as if the victim was the only contractor of the right to take photographs.

However, on March 4, 2016, the Defendant entered into an agreement with E to have the previous contractor, and the actual number of reservations did not reach about 30 cases, and even if the dispute arises with the owner of the building, he did not have the intention or ability to establish the right to lease on a deposit basis, and even if the contract is terminated due to the difficulties in the operation of the Securities Depository, he did not have the intention or ability to return the deposit even if the contract is terminated.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and the defendant is stated in the bill of indictment around July 18, 2016 as the deposit money for the right to take photographs from the victim, but it is corrected because it is deemed to be a clerical error.

It received KRW 35 million, KRW 20 million around August 9, 2016, and KRW 45 million around August 31, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

The Defendant, from July 29, 2014 to December 31, 2018, operated a wedding hall in the name of “Cweve” in the Gu B during the period from July 29, 2014 to December 31, 2018, and at the victim G office located in F during the early August 2018, the Defendant said that “it is difficult for the Tweves Sweves Sweves to pay in preference to the payment of the consideration to the victim” to the victim at the victim G office located in F during the period of early August 2018. The employees should issue a salary, and if only KRW 10,000,000,000 is lent, the payment of the consideration will be made first.”

However, the defendant borrowed money from the victim.

arrow