logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.07.13 2016고정479
공정증서원본불실기재등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On December 12, 2014, the summary of the facts charged is that the registry office of the Seoul Eastern District Court in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) held the 2014 regular general meeting of the (g) B association at the 12th floor of the building in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) and decided to dismiss and elect the directors, and then make an application for the registration of removal and appointment of the directors, the defendant must make a resolution with the consent of at least 42 of the incumbent representatives at the 42 majority of the members, and he/she shall make a resolution with the consent of at least the majority of the present representatives. However, the defendant made a request for change of the name of the director of the corporation by preparing a false application for change of the name of the director of the incorporated association as if the resolution was duly made at the general meeting of the incorporated association, including at least 23 members, including 19 members, who are not qualified for representatives.

Accordingly, a public official in charge of registration without knowledge of the fact is electronically entered in the electronic data processing of the corporate register in the same electronic records as the original copy of the process certificate so that he/she can be dismissed from (g) and seven (g) members, who are directors of the Association B, and the H and eight (h) members, etc. can be appointed, and it is used by allowing the public official to keep the electronic data processing of the corporate registration in which

2. The crime of defaulting on the original copy of a judgment is established when a false report is made to a public official to enter false facts in the original copy of a judgment. However, if there is any defect falling under invalidation even if there is no matter stated in the original copy of a judgment or there is a defect in appearance, such an omission shall be deemed to constitute a false statement (see Supreme Court Decision 2005Do4910, Aug. 25, 2005). However, in the case of applying for registration of change in the indication of the name of a person registered in accordance with a resolution at the general meeting of a non-corporate group under the Civil Act, in such a case, whether such act constitutes the cause of omission on the original copy

arrow