A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc.) are those engaged in driving service of PCX-free registration 125cc.

Around 02:55 on October 3, 2018, the Defendant driven the above Oralba, driving a four-lane road in front of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, along the two-lane distance from the epic road to the epic road, and continued to change the lanes into four-lanes.

In such a case, when the vehicle is changed to a person engaged in the vehicle driving, there was a duty of care to change the vehicle by operating direction direction, etc., giving prior notice of the change of course, and taking into account the traffic situation of the post and the post and the future.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the vehicle line to the right side as it is, and discovered a driver in front of the other four-lanes of the same direction and was driven by the victim C(57 years old) who was standing in the same direction.

As a result, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained an injury to the victim C, such as catum salt in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and suffered from the victim E (the 26-year-old age), who was on the back of the above catum, for about two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, went away without taking necessary measures, such as stopping the said taxi owned by the victim C, even though it damages approximately KRW 1,310,683 of the repair cost, and saving the victims.

2. While the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the Defendant was driving a two-wheeled vehicle, which is a two-wheeled vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. Statement of the police with C 1.