logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.08.23 2018가단229433
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shares 1/7 of each real estate listed in paragraphs 1 through 4 of the attached Table to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship 1) The network D died on March 10, 1992. The spouse died on the deceased on March 10, 1992, and the deceased on August 2, 2000, the deceased and children died on May 13, 1978, and the deceased on August 2, 2000.

3) On October 19, 1982, the deceased G’s heir, J, K, and L, the spouse of the deceased G, K, and L. (b) The network D had each ownership transfer registration for each real estate listed in the separate sheet, which was owned by the Plaintiff B, due to a title trust.

2) Since then, with respect to each real estate listed in paragraphs (1) through (4) of the separate sheet, the registration of ownership transfer was completed for the reason of the sale on April 11, 1997, and with respect to the real estate listed in paragraph (5) of the separate sheet, on January 6, 1990, for each of the following reasons: F, J, K, L, H, and the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant and the Plaintiff for the cancellation of the registration of ownership transfer against the Defendant and the Plaintiff under the Incheon District Court Decision 2001Gadan61967, the Plaintiff was ruled against the Defendant and the Plaintiff, etc. on October 30, 202.

Accordingly, the above judgment became final and conclusive around the time when F et al. received the judgment that "F et al. revoked the part concerning Defendant B among the judgment of the first instance, dismissed the lawsuit against the above Defendant F et al., dismissed the appeal against the said Defendant F et al., and dismissed the appeal against Defendant C such as F et al.".

(2) The court of the above judgment (hereinafter referred to as the “transfer judgment”). The above judgment of the court of appeal is unlawful since the lawsuit against the plaintiff is filed against a person who is not the currently registered titleholder, and the claim against the defendant C is filed against the plaintiff A, who is the child of the "net D in completing the registration of transfer of ownership under the name of the defendant C.

arrow