logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.02.09 2017누81924
난민불인정결정취소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be dismissed as “a person who is an assistant,” as “a person who is an assistant,” and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

2. The plaintiff asserts that this court's additional decision in this court is the reason for appeal that "if the plaintiff returns to Baria, a country of nationality, there is a high risk of persecution from the government on the ground that the plaintiff engaged in an independence movement in Biafra, which is a country of nationality, and therefore, there is a sufficient ground for fear that the plaintiff would be persecution."

The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court. The first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiff's assertion on the grounds as cited above, even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court was added to the evidence submitted in this court (Evidence A7).

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim, is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing plaintiff.

arrow