Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall interfere with rescue operations and emergency medical services of a rescue and emergency squad dispatched to the scene without justifiable grounds.

Nevertheless, on March 9, 2020, the Defendants: (a) expressed the desire that “the head injured due to abortion” in the lower-tier C and D was called to the scene after receiving 119 reports; (b) Defendant A expressed to the lower-tier fire brigade F belonging to the E119 emergency squad, “I must do so as to see whether I would need to see, e.g., whether I would e., this son, am, and immediately. I will do so; (c) f’s body in his hand and f’s body; (d) f’s body was pushed up by hand; and (e) f’s body was pushed up by emergency vehicles; and (e) f’s fire-fighting workers belonging to the same workplace who were in the first-class vehicle after leaving the said vehicle.”

Accordingly, Defendants conspired to interfere with the rescue and emergency medical services of first aid workers dispatched to the scene without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (in the case of the Defendant A, the date on which the second trial is made);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and G;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 28, 13(2) and (1) of the Act on 119 Rescue and Emergency Medical Services, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants: Imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the community service order: The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is deemed to obstruct the rescue and first aid services of the first responder dispatched by the Defendants after receiving a report 119, and thus, the degree of interference with the

However, the defendants appear to have the attitude to recognize the crime, and the defendants have no same record, and the defendants' age, character and conduct, the environment, the circumstances and results of the crime, and other various circumstances shown in the arguments in this case, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by the decision.