1. On July 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff B, KRW 6,259,804, KRW 4,173,202, and each of the said amounts, respectively, to Plaintiff C and D.

1. Basic facts

A. The deceased and the Defendant’s relationship A (hereinafter “the deceased”) and the Defendant were the employees who worked together with KONEX Co., Ltd.

B. The Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 on September 29, 2014, for the injury case No. 2014 high-level380 by Youngju District Court, Youngju District Court, which issued a summary order of KRW 2,00,00. The facts constituting the crime of the above summary order are as follows: “The Defendant discovered the victim A (the age of 56) who was going into operation, found the victim A (the age of 56) around July 4, 2014, and caused the victim’s injury, such as catum base, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment by cutting down the shape and batfs of the victim (hereinafter “instant harmful act”).

(2) On October 13, 2014, the Defendant filed an application for formal trial with the same court (2014 high-end51).

On January 15, 2015, the above court found the Defendant guilty only for the crime of assault among the facts charged on the grounds that “it is difficult to view that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was proven without any reasonable doubt that the Defendant injured the victim by destroying the victim,” and found the Defendant not guilty of the charge of assault, and sentenced the Defendant to a fine of KRW 50,000.

3) On January 20, 2015, a prosecutor appealed the judgment of the first instance as the Cheongju District Court 2015No105 against the judgment. The appellate court accepted the prosecutor’s appeal on July 16, 2015 and rendered a guilty judgment as to the crime of injury, and reversed the judgment of the first instance and sentenced to a fine of KRW 2,00,000 to the Defendant. 4) The Defendant appealed as the Supreme Court Decision 2015Do12874 on July 23, 2015, but the Supreme Court sentenced the dismissal judgment of the first instance on October 15, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.

(hereinafter referred to as the “relevant criminal case”). (c)

The Deceased’s death and the Plaintiffs’ inheritance 1) The Deceased died on December 20, 2016, during which the instant lawsuit was pending. 2) The Deceased’s heir, the wife, and Plaintiff C and D, the wife, were the deceased.