Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around April 2007, the Defendant appointed the Defendant as the representative director of the C Co., Ltd. and transferred all of C’s shares to D around September 2009 while operating the said C. The representative director of C was changed to E around November 201 and to F around July 201.

G around August 21, 2012, around August 21, 2012, the entire shares of the above C were transferred from the above D and held a general meeting of shareholders to take office as a director, and the above F was dismissed from the representative director, and the defendant dismissed the above G from the director, and he thought that he prepared a false copy of the general meeting of shareholders that appoints the above B as the representative director.

1. On November 26, 2014, the Defendant prepared a copy of the general meeting of shareholders stating that “A person who holds 30,000 shares of 10,00 C Co., Ltd. on November 26, 2014 and one shareholder who holds 30,000 shares of 30,00 shares shall be present at the I Certified Judicial Scriveners Office located at P, P, and that “B shall be appointed as the inside director,” and signed a copy of the general meeting of shareholders stating that “B shall be appointed as the representative director,” and affixed B seal on the next page of the representative director B.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant prepared a copy of a copy of the general meeting of shareholders, which is a private document concerning rights and duties or proof of facts, using the qualification of representative director C of the corporation without authority.

2. On November 26, 2014, the Defendant, at a notary office located in K at the time of Pakistan, submitted a copy of a copy of the general meeting of shareholders, which was prepared with qualification as above, to the employees in charge of the said notary office, who knew of such fact, as if it was duly formed.

In this respect, the defendant exercised a document prepared with qualification ambiguously.

3. On November 26, 2014, the Defendant held an event, such as a false entry into a public electronic record, a false entry into an electronic record, etc., and an electronic record of a false entry into the records, etc., that “in-house director G shall be dismissed,” “In-house director B and J shall be appointed,” and “B shall be appointed to the representative director.”