The defendant's KRW 253,800,000 to the plaintiff and 6% per annum from October 1, 2015 to December 17, 2015.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff is a stock company with a main business purpose of selling computer peripheral devices wholesale and retail business, and the defendant is a stock company with a business purpose of selling PVC wholesale wholesale and retail business, etc., and the defendant purchased from the plaintiff on September 30, 2015 253,80,000 won and received delivery from the plaintiff on September 30, 2015.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the above purchase price of KRW 253,800,000 and damages for delay from October 1, 2015, which is the day following the date on which the Plaintiff delivered the above Kameras to the Plaintiff.

2. On September 25, 2015, the Defendant’s defense to the effect that the Defendant repaid KRW 300,250,000 with the above sales price on September 25, 2015. Thus, according to the statement in the evidence No. 1, it can be acknowledged that the Defendant deposited KRW 300,250,000 with the account in the name of Nonparty CBB Co., Ltd. on September 25, 2015. However, there is no evidence as to the fact that the above amount was paid for the repayment of the sales price of this case. Therefore, the Defendant’s defense is without merit.

3. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the above 253,80,000 won and the above 6% per annum from October 1, 2015 to December 17, 2015, the service date of the original copy of the payment order of this case, and 15% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment under the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition.