logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.02.21 2015가단114494
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuits, the part demanding payment of KRW 2,283,690 shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant shall make a report to the plaintiff on 99.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On April 28, 2015, B: (a) around 05:43, April 28, 2015, Category C car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

2) The Plaintiff’s bicycle driving on the three-lane 466 east 466 km from the KSX Lighting Station to the Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawn, and the Plaintiff’s bicycle driving on the three-lane Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawn Hawk had the Plaintiff go beyond the floor (hereinafter “instant

(2) The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as patha, Haaktha, Haaktha, 2ndathatha, etc. due to the instant accident. Around May 15, 2015, the Plaintiff received hospitalized treatment after being administered externally and being hospitalized after being hospitalized. Around May 15, 2015, the Plaintiff had been hospitalized before and after having been hospitalized for the same day. At present, the Plaintiff had a permanent disability of 56% (2 parts, brain, i.e., e., e., chromatic disability assessment table, i., X-3, and occupational coefficient 5) due to the instant accident.

3) The Defendant is an insurer that has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the instant vehicle. [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 11 (including paper numbers), the result of the instant court’s physical appraisal commission to the director of the Seoul GIU and the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the instant accident as the insurer of the instant vehicle.

C. According to the result of the fact-finding on the appraiser D of this court, the degree of contribution No. 14, No. 14, and No. 4, and the result of the fact-finding on the appraiser D of the Gatoo University of this case, the plaintiff's age (60 years old or older, 0 days), the development period (2-40 days to 15 days), and the level of credit (11-15 points, 1 points) are considered as follows.

arrow