1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

Judgment of the first instance.

1. The Plaintiff filed a registration of ownership transfer against Defendant B on May 29, 2015 with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2, and filed a registration of ownership transfer on May 29, 2015, against Defendant B on the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3, the Busan District Court, Busan District Court’s registration of cancellation of the establishment registration of neighboring mortgage completed under No. 45645 and No. 45666 of July 1, 2005, against Defendant C, filed a registration of cancellation of the establishment registration of neighboring mortgage completed under No. 46544 of receipt on July 1, 2005 with the same registry office, and the court of the first instance rejected the claim for cancellation registration of the establishment registration of neighboring mortgage and the

In this regard, the plaintiff appealed only, and the defendants did not appeal, and the part of the claim for cancellation of the registration of the establishment of the neighboring mortgage becomes final and conclusive. Therefore, the scope of the court's judgment

2. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is the third child between the network D and E, and the defendant is the first child.

B. On May 31, 197, the Defendant acquired ownership of the real estate listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the attached Table (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

C. The above E and the Defendant owned 1/2 shares each of the above E and the above-mentioned and the Defendant owned a building of 114.4 square meters and 122.3 square meters and its ground (hereinafter “O-dong real estate”). On July 23, 2015, E completed the registration of transfer of ownership with respect to their shares on the ground of donation to ASEAN, who is the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including branch numbers for those with a satisfy number), the purport of the whole pleadings

3. On May 29, 2015, the Plaintiff alleged that the Plaintiff, E, and the Defendant transferred 1/2 shares of the O-owned real estate to M or M as designated by the Defendant, and the Defendant agreed to transfer the ownership of the instant land and building to the Plaintiff, and that the instant real estate was based on the agreement.