logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.08.16 2017고단168
공갈등
Text

The Court held that a fine of KRW 7,00,000 shall be imposed on the defendant's crime of conflict and attempted crime of conflict.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 14, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury, etc. at the Changwon District Court’s Tong-young branch on February 11, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Tong-young detention center.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around 09:00 on April 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was a person residing in the “D Village”; (b) the victim E engaged in the aggregate transport business carried out earth and sand to the construction site for the F apartment construction of the F apartment at Dong-si on April 29, 2016; and (c) the Defendant attempted to fill up the said earth and sand on G land in the vicinity of the said “D Village”; (d) the Defendant’s monetary demand, the Defendant filed a civil petition at any time stating that the noise and dust occurred by the damaged person’s construction work and damages to the residents of the D Village; and (c) the victim E, who carried out the aggregate transport business, would interfere with the progress of the work of the victim, thereby threatening the victim to take money and valuables.

Therefore, the defendant filed a civil petition against the victim who was found to have been in order to hear the statement that the defendant filed a civil petition several times in his/her place of residence near the same day at around 18:00 and to ask for the reason that he/she would not perform construction work for the defendant, and filed a civil petition against the victim so that he/she may not execute construction work without such request.

“Intimidating the victim to the purport, the victim received cash amounting to one million won at the same place from the person suffering from frighten damage.”

2. On April 30, 2016, the Defendant who attempted to go to the public refers to the purport that “I would not perform construction work,” as a dump truck engineer, in order to smoothly perform construction work upon the request of the victim in the vicinity of his/her dwelling place located in the above H, and “I would not perform construction work,” as in the preceding day, and “I 1 million won and work in order to perform construction work” to the victim on the same day.

o.

arrow