Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Intimidation, etc.) committed a violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) against the Defendant committed a violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) on January 2020 against the victim C (ma, 52 years of age), and D (V, 52 years of age) who operated the B main points located in Kim Jong-si (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”) by reporting to the Defendant
Around April 21, 2020, the Defendant expressed a talk to the effect of threatening the victim C by telephone, and at around 21:00, the Defendant threatened the victim C and D, as stated above, with the victim C and D, “I wish not to leave the female employees, even if I were to pay a fine, I want not to leave her face, but to leave her eye, I would not leave her eye.”
나. 피고인은 2020. 8. 5. 01:00경 위 B에서 피해자 D에게 “벌금 700만원 나왔는데 내가 뭘 잘못했느냐. 내가 벌금은 내지만 너희들도 장사를 못하게 하겠다. 씨벌년놈들 다 죽여버리겠다. 내가 또 와서 두고 보자”라고 말하면서 피해자 D를 협박하였다.
C. Around August 14, 2020, the Defendant, at around 21:30, expressed that there was another inside of the above B, and that the Defendant would be prevented from performing scarbing funeral services as he continues to exist inside. B continues to interfere with the business and the scarbs continued to report. The Defendant threatened the victim D by stating that she is she is sheath.
Accordingly, the defendant threatened victims with the purpose of retaliation for the provision of investigation reports related to the investigation or trial of his criminal case.
2. The defendant who interferes with his business; and
(b).
No. 1. at the time of subsection B above, in front of the B carper.
(b).
In the same way as in the paragraph, it interfered with the victim D's main business operations by force by leaving the victim D with his/her abusive behavior.
3. The Defendant is obstruction of the performance of official duties.