The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case as a result of the appeal (unfair assertion of the grounds for appeal) and divided the errors and did not repeat the crime, etc. can be considered in favor of the defendant.

However, the defendant has a history of criminal punishment five times for the same crime of fraud, and some of the crimes of this case were committed in the course of or after being investigated into the same crime by an investigative agency or before a trial. The crime of this case is committed in a planned manner by means of anonymousness on the Internet, deceiving many unspecified persons as if they were sold goods, and then deceiving them, which is not good quality of the crime, such as undermining the order of goods on the Internet space based on credit, and harming a considerable period of time, and there is no other circumstance to deem that the victims continued to have been no agreement with the victims up to the trial, and that there was no other circumstance to deem that they were taking measures to recover from damage, the range of recommending punishment according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing Commission (one to two years and six months) [the decision of punishment] [the scope of punishment and recommending punishment in the recommended area] [the scope of punishment] where the victim is punished with imprisonment with prison labor for an unspecified area or for a considerable period of time, or with prison labor for a considerable period of time, the defendant's age of one to the age of two to six years and six years.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.