logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원장흥지원 2016.08.09 2015가합739
근저당권말소
Text

1. The defendant is against the non-party agricultural corporation A.

(a) As to the real estate listed in Appendix 1 List.

Reasons

1. The description of the claim is as shown in Appendix 2 of the Claim.

2. Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of the Acts (a written reply demanding the dismissal of the Plaintiff’s claim, even though the Defendant submitted a written reply demanding the dismissal of the Plaintiff’s claim, according to the following written statements, the Defendant appears to have been actually aware of the Plaintiff’s claim. As such, it is deemed that the Defendant was actually aware of the purport of recognizing the Plaintiff’s claim pursuant to Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act.

arrow