1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant, including the claim extended and modified by this court, is as follows.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is cited in accordance with

2.Paragraph 1 of the part to be dried (based on recognition) shall be written with the following parts:

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute are written in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 9 through 11, 13, and 14 (including a variety number), and the entire purport of the pleading as to the whole of the pleadings, and the "Ycheon-si C 486 square meters" in Article 1-1 (1) 3-4 of the purport of the whole pleading.

Article 1-2(2)1-2 of the Act provides that “The Defendant jointly succeeded to the instant land” shall be construed as “the Defendant solely succeeded to the instant land.”

Article 2-1 (1) 4 through 5 of the Act provides that “The Defendant shall apply to the Plaintiff with respect to the instant land,” “The Plaintiff shall be subject to the Plaintiff’s share of 1/2 of the instant land.”

All of the defendants in paragraph (2) of Article 2-2 are used as "the defendant," and the "the defendants" in paragraph (1) 1 of the same paragraph shall be "the defendant," "the defendant," "the defendant," "the defendant," and "the defendant," in paragraph (6) 1 of the same Article, shall each be "the defendant," "the defendant," "the defendant," respectively.

3. Accordingly, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding the plaintiff's claim for ownership transfer registration based on the completion of the prescriptive acquisition period against the defendant, including the plaintiff's claim for extension and change in this court, should be accepted ( insofar as the plaintiff's claim for ownership transfer registration based on the completion of prescriptive acquisition is accepted, no separate determination is made as to the claim for ownership transfer registration based on selective sale) is to be changed. It is so decided as per Disposition.