Defendants are not guilty.

1. The facts charged against Defendant A and Defendant B lend money to the victim D; Defendant C introduced Defendant A to the victim and the victim did not pay the money to the victim.

money was received in order to avoid disturbance.

Defendants conspired to visit the F shop operated by the injured party to Dongducheon-si on November 28, 2016, and Defendant B shall pay the victim money at any time.

C. The remaining money was removed and grow up.

Whether they should be respected with people in the Eastern People, and whether they will die.

”라고 큰 소리로 욕설하고, 피고인 A은 피해자에게 “ 씹쌔 끼, 가발을 벗겨 버릴라 ”라고 욕설하는 등 소란을 피워 피해자가 영업 중이 던 가게에 있던 손님들을 나가게 하거나 손님을 들어 오지 못하게 하는 방법으로 위력으로 피해자의 가게 영업 업무를 방해하는 등 2016. 10. 10. 경부터 2016. 11. 28. 경까지 별지 범죄 일람표 기재와 같이 피고인 A은 총 4회에 걸쳐, 피고인 C는 총 1회에 걸쳐, 피고인 B은 총 4회에 걸쳐 함께 피해 자의 가게에 찾아가 위와 같이 위력을 행사하는 방법으로 피해자의 귀금속 가게 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

2. Determination

A. “Authority” of the crime of interference with business refers to any force that may cause suppression and confusion with a free will of a person. As such, violence, intimidation, as well as social, economic, political status, and pressure based on the right and interest, etc. are included therein, and in reality, the victim’s free will is not required to be controlled. However, in light of the offender’s status, number of persons, surrounding circumstances, etc., it refers to the force sufficient to suppress the victim’s free will. As such, whether it constitutes force is the date and place of crime, motive, purpose, number of persons involved in the crime, form of force, type of duty, type of duty, and the status of the victim.