Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court on September 11, 2008, to a fine of KRW 200,000,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, on March 21, 2012, in the same court on March 21, 201, to a fine of KRW 5,00,000 for the same crime in the same court on April 9, 2015, respectively, and on April 6, 2016, to a fine of KRW 5,00,000 was sentenced to a suspended sentence for ten months for the same crime.

On July 7, 2017, around 18:23, the Defendant driven a motor bicycle driver, a motor device, Kwik-dong, without obtaining a bicycle license with approximately 1km alcohol level of 0.171% while under influence of alcohol level of 0.5% in the blood, from an insular area below the old inland Eup of the Gu internal waters at the time of the Cheongju-do, the Defendant driven a motor bicycle, a motor device, at Kwik-dong, without obtaining a bicycle license for alcohol level of 0.171%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement on the circumstances of the driver at the main place, and statement of alcohol alcohol during blood;

1. The driver's license ledger and a report on detection of the driver's license;

1. Sickboard photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (verification of criminal history of a suspect) statute;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1) of the Traffic Act (the point of repeated drinking), Article 154 subparagraph 2, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act has a history of having been punished several times due to drinking or non-licenseing, and the crime of this case is committed during the same suspension period, etc. under the unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant was committed during the same suspension period, and the degree of risk compared to driving of the vehicle is relatively little, although it is merely a legal site, it appears that the defendant could not have been properly aware of whether it is prohibited, and it appears that it would be more favorable circumstances.