The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court convicted the victim D of the part concerning the fraud of the instant facts charged in the instant case, as indicated in the attached Table Nos. 7 through 9, 35, and 45 of the crime committed in the judgment below.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the criminal intent of deception and deception in fraud, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the criminal intent of deception and deception in fraud

Furthermore, even if examining the record, there is no error in the first instance trial proceedings as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

The argument that the lower court erred by failing to take into account the grounds for sentencing favorable to the Defendant beyond the inherent limits of sentencing discretion is ultimately an allegation of unfair sentencing.

However, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.