logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.09.18 2015고정560
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, as the field director of Defendant B, is responsible for the safety and health management for workers belonging to the “D Hospital Extension Corporation” site located in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Incheon Special Metropolitan City, and Defendant B is a business owner who performs the “D Hospital Extension Corporation” as a corporation established on June 12, 2014 for the purpose of construction business with its head office located in Seo-gu, Incheon Special Metropolitan City E and 501, and is a business owner who performs the “D Hospital Extension Corporation” as a corporation established on June 12, 2014 for the purpose of construction business with its head office located in Seo-gu, Incheon Special Metropolitan City.

With respect to the supervision of occupational safety and health performed on the site of "D Hospital Extension Corporation" on May 8, 2015:

1. Defendant A:

A. Although a business owner installs a bridge-type passage, etc., he/she must install a solid structure, the interval of a board must be specified, and measures are taken to prevent the sloping or getting out of the bridge, the Defendant did not take measures to prevent the sloping or getting out of the bridge. However, the Defendant did not take measures to prevent the sloping or getting out of the bridge.

B. In the event that a business owner engages in a work by assembling a mobile belt, he/she shall prevent the front line, and even if the work is conducted at the highest part of the non-standing, he/she did not take measures to prevent the front line, and did not install a safe line at the highest part of the non-standing where the work is performed.

C. Even if a business owner does not dismantle or stop the use of protective devices installed in machines, apparatus, or equipment, the Defendant, despite being unable to do so, made the Defendant use high speed cuters and handbagers used in the field with a dismantled cover.

2. Defendant B did not perform its duty of safety and health measures as stated in the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.

arrow