logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.08.20 2015고정555
경범죄처벌법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 11, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Cheongju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

[2015 High Court Decision 55]

1. Around 07:00 on June 2, 2013, the Defendant sent off a place that ought to be seen in front of the Chungcheongnam-gun B, Chungcheongnam-do, and made an displeasure to other persons.

[2015 High Court Decision 558]

2. At around 10:40 on January 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in the E-cafeteria located in D, a reasonable Cheongju-si.

Summary of Evidence

[The first point in the market, the second point in 2015, the second half of 55]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written request for a notice [the second point in the market, the second point in the market, the second point in the market, the second point in the market];

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written request for a notice disposition (before the date of the sale, and before the date of the order, 2015),

1. Criminal records and the application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Article 3(1)3 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (in the case of over-concentration and fine) and Article 3(1)20 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act concerning criminal facts, it is clear that the applicable provisions of the Act to the summary judgment application are written in writing;

(The point of disturbance of sound address, the choice of fine)

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. The first sentence of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which states the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, is a crime committed with the same opportunity as each crime of the previous offense in which one and half years have been sentenced to imprisonment, and both the first and second subparagraphs of the ruling, are the crimes committed with the same opportunity as the crime of the previous offense in which one and half years have been sentenced, and the sentence against the defendant who

arrow