The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the punishment of the court below (one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of fraud listed in [Attachment Table Nos. 1 through 45 of the judgment below among the crime of fraud listed in paragraph (1) of the crime of fraud listed in the judgment below and paragraph (2) of the crime of fraud listed in the judgment below, and one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of fraud listed in [Attachment Table No. 46 through 51 of the judgment below among the crime of fraud listed in paragraph

2. The judgment appears to have an opportunity to reflect on the crime of this case by committing the crime of this case. The victim C and H expressed their intention not to want punishment against the defendant at an investigative agency. The victim C wanted to have a preference against the defendant, and the crime of fraud as stated in the judgment of the court below among the crime of fraud as stated in paragraph 1 of the crime of this case as stated in the judgment of the court below and the crime of fraud as stated in paragraph 2 of the judgment of the court below should consider the equality with the case where the judgment is to be rendered simultaneously with the special larceny as stated in the judgment of the court below.

However, even if the Defendant did not know even during the period of parole when he was released from prison after having been released from prison in the same criminal record, he did not know of the crime of this case, and acquired the amount of 800 million won or more in total from the victims for the four years, and did not fully repay the damage, all of the crime of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime, and even if he was punished by a fine against other victims, he did not discontinue the crime of this case even though he was punished by a fine by committing fraud, and other various factors stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, which are the conditions for sentencing, are considered in light of the above favorable circumstances, it does not seem that the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3...