The judgment below

The part of the defendant's case shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for twenty-two years.

A knife knife knife f.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Part 1 of the case of the defendant and the person to whom the attachment order was requested, the person to whom the probation order was requested, and the court below also requested the attachment order and the person to whom the probation order was requested (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant").

2) The sentence sentenced to the Defendant (one-eight years of imprisonment on the basis of the principal sentence) is too unreasonable and unfair.2) The sentence sentenced by the Prosecutor to the Defendant is too uneasible and unfair.

B. Part of a request for attachment order and a probation order request: It is improper for the court below to dismiss both a request for attachment order and a probation order against the defendant even if the prosecutor's defendant is deemed to pose a risk of repeating murder crimes.

2. Determination of the accused case

A. The life of a human being is a member of the dignity of a human being, whose own purpose is, and if he/she loses his/her value once, he/she cannot be able to see his/her life in his/her world because he/she cannot do so.

Murder is the highest legal interest protected by the law of our society, and the life of the person who is the highest absolute value, and when compared with other crimes, it cannot be justified for any reason that the result is very heavy and it is virtually impossible to recover the damage entirely after the commission of the crime. The defendant's liability is heavy.

B. Around May 2016, the Defendant was aware of the Victim’s Doctrine and had a sense of view and had a living together with the Victim’s home from around the end of May 2018. As such, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s Doctrine that the Defendant had been able to see the Defendant’s attitude of disregarding the Defendant by gambling or singing and singing and singing and singing and singing. However, the Defendant’s Doctrine’s receipt was found in the Defendant’s money, and the Defendant’s phone or telephone.