The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) is as follows: (a) the Defendant uses fire extinguishers to extinguish fires by stating that the victim was out of fire; and (b) there are only facts between the victim and the victim; and (c) does not pose a threat to the victim and the victim.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victim, consistently from the police investigation process to the court of the court below, stated that the Defendant: (a) the victim took a fire extinguisher to the Defendant, and attempted to take the victim at the time of the occurrence of the defect; and (b) the police officer E dispatched to the scene at the time of the instant case using CCTV images installed at the scene “in the court of the court of the court below,” thereby threatening the Defendant and threatening the victim.

In the lower court’s trial, F.C. at the time of the instant case, the police officer posted a photograph to the effect that he stated to the effect that “I wish to move out” was “I wish to move out,” and recorded CCTV images with handphones.

The defendant saw the fire fighter because the victim stated to the purport, and the F stated that the victim was not the victim.

In full view of the fact that F’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’

In the same purport, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just, and there is no error of mistake that affected the judgment.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.